Democracy methods

Democracy methods for clearer decision signals

Democratic methods solve different parts of collective decision-making. Nicolas fits the narrower moment when a group needs an intensity-aware vote after discussion, agenda setting, or delegation.

A method is not a whole institution

A citizens' assembly needs recruitment, sortition, evidence, facilitation, deliberation, and public accountability, while participatory democracy needs outreach and legitimacy and liquid democracy needs delegation rules.

Nicolas is narrower by design. It provides decision infrastructure for moments where a group can name alternatives and wants to measure support, opposition, delegation, and preference intensity.

Where Nicolas belongs

Use Nicolas after deliberation, during proposal prioritization, or inside a participatory process when the group needs a structured decision signal rather than another forum or comment thread.

The useful question is not whether quadratic voting replaces democracy. It is whether a particular democratic process needs an intensity-aware voting layer.

FAQ

Is Nicolas a deliberation platform?

No. Nicolas is a decision mechanism for clear alternatives. It can complement deliberation, but it does not manage facilitation, evidence, recruitment, or discussion.

Is quadratic voting a democratic method?

Quadratic voting can be used inside democratic processes when the goal is to measure preference intensity under equal starting budgets.

Why include liquid democracy?

Nicolas supports liquid delegation, so liquid democracy is the closest democracy-method category to its actual product behavior.